The Importance of Employee Handbooks in California

Although there are many advantages to utilizing an employee handbook, from a purely legal perspective, the employer is usually hoping to establish ground rules of acceptable conduct and prevent the company from being subjected to legal liability. The sources of such liability are many, from wage disputes to wrongful termination, discrimination and harassment claims.

A good employee handbook will not prevent such a claim from arising, but can assist the company in defending its actions.

A poorly drafted handbook can actually be used against the company to prove the claimant's case. For example, some preprinted handbooks contain sections dealing with the progressive discipline of employees, containing a comprehensive scheme from oral warning to termination. Courts have found that a company that does not follow this disciplinary scheme can be held liable for wrongful termination. Other courts have held that such policies may imply that the company can only terminate for good cause. This can be a problem in California where employees are typically "at-will" employees. This means that an employee can be terminated any time, and for any reason (so long as the reason is not based on race, religion, etc....). However, if an employer adopts a progressive discipline system, the company may find that its employees are no longer "at will" employees.

Many prepared handbooks contain so-called "use it or lose it" provisions governing vacation pay. In fact, the California Supreme Court has declared such policies to be illegal. A company that utilizes such a policy to forfeit the accrued but unused vacation pay of a departing employee can find itself liable not only for the monetary value of the accrued vacation time, but interest and penalties equal to 30 days worth of the employee's salary.

The decision to create and enforce company policy in a written document is an excellent idea. However, care must be taken to make sure that the employee handbook complies with all state and federal laws and regulations. Once in place, the employee handbook must be updated at least once, if not twice, a year.

The Orange County lawyers at Jacobs and Dodds can assist you in drafting your company's employee handbook. Call us at (949) 645-7300 or visit us at our web site at www.newportbeachattorneys.org

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Independent Contractor Law - 2018

The California Supreme Court case of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County   tightens the law regarding who is or is not an independent contractor at a business. The April 2018 court ruling states that workers are assumed to be employees unless all three of these factors can be proven: (A) that the worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of such work and in fact; (B) that the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and (C) that the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed for the hiring entity. The Court stated: "In the underlying lawsuit in this matter, two individual delivery drivers, suing on their own behalf and on behalf of a class of allegedly similarly situated drivers, filed a
Read more

Ninth Circuit Case on Rounding of Employees Time

In the 9th Circuit case of Andrew Corbin v. Time Warner Entertainment- Advance the Court addressed the issue of employers who round off time worked by employees in computing their wages. In the Corbin case the employer rounded time off to the nearest quarter hour.  As stated by the Court, "This case turns on $15.02 and one minute. $15.02 represents the total amount of compensation that Plaintiff Andre Corbin (“Corbin”) alleges he has lost due to his employer’s, Defendant Time Warner EntertainmentAdvance/Newhouse Partnership (“TWEAN”), compensation policy that rounds all employee time stamps to the nearest quarter-hour. One minute represents the total amount of time for which Corbin alleges he was not compensated as he once mistakenly opened an auxiliary computer program before clocking into TWEAN’s timekeeping software platform. $15.02 in lost wages and one minute of uncompensated time, Corbin argued before the district court, entitled him to relief under the Fair Labor Standa
Read more

California Employers and How to Defend Wage and Hour Claims before the Division of Labor Standards and Enforcement

In California the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) adjudicates wage claims on behalf of workers who file claims for nonpayment of wages, overtime, or vacation pay, pursuant to California Labor Code sections 96 and 98. DLSE deputies hold informal conferences between employers and employees to resolve wage disputes. If a matter cannot be resolved at the informal conference, an administrative hearing is held to make a final determination on the matter. An employee (plaintiff) alleging the non-payment of wages or other compensation by his or her employer (defendant), must file a claim (the DLSE Form 1, “Initial Report or Claim” form) with a local office of DLSE to initiate investigation of the claim by the Labor Commissioner.  The employee is asked to provide any time records the plaintiff kept of the hours and dates worked that support the claim, paychecks and pay stubs showing the wages paid during the claim period and dishonored (or “bounced”) paycheck(s) during the clai
Read more