Mediation vs. Arbitration


In a perfect world there would be no business lawsuits because the parties involved would resolve their differences without resorting to court action.  

At Jacobs & Dodds each of our lawyers has been trying cases for over 30 years. Last year partner Paul Jacobs spent over four months in trial. However, before resorting to litigation, every attempt is made to settle our clients' business disputes before a lawsuit is filed. There are several alternative dispute resolution methods that can be effective in resolving business disputes. The two most common are mediation and arbitration. 

Mediation 

Simply put, a mediator seeks to help parties to develop a shared understanding of the conflict and to work toward building a practical and lasting resolution. Mediation usually does not take place in front of a judge (although it can). Mediation typically takes place before a lawsuit is filed, although mediation can occur during the course of litigation.  

Several different styles of mediation exist . Two of the more common forms are evaluative and transformative. 

Evaluative mediation has an advisory component because the mediator evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each side's legal position. Transformative mediators do not approach mediation in this manner.

Transformative mediation, in contrast, looks at conflict as a crisis in communication between two or more parties and seeks to help resolve the conflict thereby allowing the parties to overcome their differences. The agreement that arises from this type of mediation occurs as a natural outcome of the resolution of conflict. 

Mediation serves to identify the disputed issues and to generate options that help the parties reach a mutually-satisfactory resolution. If a mediation is successful, the settlement reached is agreed to by all of the parties. This contrasts with litigation, which normally settles the dispute in favor of the party with the strongest legal argument. A judge or jury makes the determination, not the parties.

 Arbitration  

There is some confusion about the difference between mediation and arbitration. While mediation attempts to resolve business disputes, primarily by defining the dispute and then working to find a practical resolution, arbitration involves the appointment of an arbitrator who listens to the facts concerning the business dispute and then applies the applicable law and renders a decision (award) that may be binding or non-binding on the parties.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

New Independent Contractor Law - 2018

The California Supreme Court case of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County   tightens the law regarding who is or is not an independent contractor at a business. The April 2018 court ruling states that workers are assumed to be employees unless all three of these factors can be proven: (A) that the worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of such work and in fact; (B) that the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and (C) that the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as the work performed for the hiring entity. The Court stated: "In the underlying lawsuit in this matter, two individual delivery drivers, suing on their own behalf and on behalf of a class of allegedly similarly situated drivers, filed a ...
Read more

Ninth Circuit Case on Rounding of Employees Time

In the 9th Circuit case of Andrew Corbin v. Time Warner Entertainment- Advance the Court addressed the issue of employers who round off time worked by employees in computing their wages. In the Corbin case the employer rounded time off to the nearest quarter hour.  As stated by the Court, "This case turns on $15.02 and one minute. $15.02 represents the total amount of compensation that Plaintiff Andre Corbin (“Corbin”) alleges he has lost due to his employer’s, Defendant Time Warner EntertainmentAdvance/Newhouse Partnership (“TWEAN”), compensation policy that rounds all employee time stamps to the nearest quarter-hour. One minute represents the total amount of time for which Corbin alleges he was not compensated as he once mistakenly opened an auxiliary computer program before clocking into TWEAN’s timekeeping software platform. $15.02 in lost wages and one minute of uncompensated time, Corbin argued before the district court, entitled him to relief under the Fair Labor Standa...
Read more

California Employers and How to Defend Wage and Hour Claims before the Division of Labor Standards and Enforcement

In California the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) adjudicates wage claims on behalf of workers who file claims for nonpayment of wages, overtime, or vacation pay, pursuant to California Labor Code sections 96 and 98. DLSE deputies hold informal conferences between employers and employees to resolve wage disputes. If a matter cannot be resolved at the informal conference, an administrative hearing is held to make a final determination on the matter. An employee (plaintiff) alleging the non-payment of wages or other compensation by his or her employer (defendant), must file a claim (the DLSE Form 1, “Initial Report or Claim” form) with a local office of DLSE to initiate investigation of the claim by the Labor Commissioner.  The employee is asked to provide any time records the plaintiff kept of the hours and dates worked that support the claim, paychecks and pay stubs showing the wages paid during the claim period and dishonored (or “bounced”) paycheck(s) during the ...
Read more